The following paragraph is not an entry out of “Mike’s Brag Book.” I only present it to support the point I plan on making in this post.
I have written books, and have edited other writers’ books, since before the invention of movable type. I’ve published over twenty novels, nearly all with mainstream publishers. Writers with whom I’ve worked have published well over a hundred books, and this is not counting the ones that have been self-published. It would seem, on the surface at least, that I have some clue as to what I’m doing.
So why in the name of Zeus’s butthole am I re-editing one of my already published novels for what must be the hundredth time!?
Here’s the backstory, short version: when I emerged from my seventeen-year hiatus from writing and publishing back in 2010, I found a small, start-up house that eventually published two of my novels, Fire Dance and The Burning Ground, both ghost stories. The former had been written for Bantam Books in the ’90s, but after my editor left they pulled out of the deal. The latter—well, that was written almost in its entirety in 2011, and I felt damn good that I could still create something practically from scratch.
Flash forward to about a month ago. The two books had run their course with the start-up publisher, so I took back my rights and am planning on releasing both under my Atoris Press imprint. I chose Fire Dance first (my only novel to be reviewed in Publishers Weekly—positively, no less), and since I had to re-format it anyway, I figured I’d have another editing run-through.
Now, understand this: back in the ’90s I did my usual three drafts before advising Bantam that it was ready. After they cut me loose, I sat on it for a while (pissed, I was) before cleaning it up again for possible submission. A half-hearted and short-lived attempt to get back into the game halfway through those seventeen years saw me clean it up a couple times more, and before the start-up publisher took it on I did additional work on it. So re-editing it one more time, as I’ve been doing for the past few weeks, should have been a piece of cake, right?
Wrong!
Oh, there were a few typos—not a lot, but in my purview even one is too many. (One line really made me lose my lunch: He took another step toward them, gritty sand crunching beneath the souls of his heavy boots.) Much worse: anyone who has worked with me knows how much I detest overuse of passive verbs such as “was” and “were.” In the published version—over 1,500 of the damn things! That has now been reduced by nearly two-thirds, much of those that remain in either dialogue or close third POV.
Even worse: the entire story—discounting the 1878 opening chapter—takes place over the course of sixteen days in 1994, with the Fourth of July in the middle of them. In a much earlier draft I used a different year, but when I changed it to 1994 I did nothing about the days of the week, so I had the Fourth falling on a Wednesday, when in fact that year it fell on a Monday. That put every day in the story off by two. Crap!
The new, improved, revised, properly dated Fire Dance will be available once again within a few weeks. Will it be pristine? I hope so—but who knows?
A lesson here for writers, experienced or otherwise: take your time with your revisions, your copyediting, your research, all the way through your final proofing. Don’t shortchange your readers, and most of all, don’t shortchange yourself. You’ve already put a lot of blood, sweat, tears, time, and coffee into your story, so why dash to the finish line?
Being around writers for the past few centuries as an editor, coach, and teacher, I’ve seen this happen all too often. If you’ve lost your objectivity from being with your manuscript for so long, or if you’re just sick of the project, take a few steps back and leave it alone for a while. Even better: find a fresh set of eyes to look at your manuscript while you take a break. You don’t want to be revising the same story for the rest of your natural life.
I’ll start my work on The Burning Ground next month. Hopefully, there will be a lot fewer “Aw shit!” moments with that one.
Well I have that process to look forward to by the end of the year. Writing seems hard until going back to edit…and you’re right about rushing, I know I’ll be tempted to do so but I must resist.
I hope your relaunch goes well.
Thanks. And good luck with your writing. Sounds like you’re getting close!
No matter how good something may be overall (unfortunate typos aside) the mind can always keep coming up with some “better way” to express your story ideas than the last time you gave it a shot. At least that’s what I’ve found to be true. (No comments about my lack of experience compared to yours, please.) 🙂
What really sucks is when you realize that an entire book sucked, BIG time, and mere editing isn’t going to solve that problem. Then you end up turning it inside out, upside down, and then sideways, for good measure. You know it’s working when the light begins to dawn, because you’ve finally pulled your head out of your butt.
But that is a result of your great advice to put something aside until you practically forget about it. Only then can you go back and say, “Dear gods, did I really write that crap?” And then proceed to fix it.
I do believe that I’ve uttered the words, “Did I write that crap?” just as often as I’ve said, “Is the Padres game on yet?” And that’s a lotta times! 🙂
I needed this reminder today! 😀 Working, working, working… Thanks for the helpful post.
Here’s wishing you much fewer “Aw shit!” moments than I’ve known in a long career! 🙂
Haha. I’ve lost count!